Jump to content

Talk:Russulaceae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleRussulaceae is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 25, 2018.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 12, 2015Good article nomineeListed
May 9, 2015Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

older entries

[edit]

'Knack' isn't a sound or a way of breaking in English! My dictionary gives 'knacker' as a castanet etc., which is related to the German meaning (nothing to do with the usual English meaning), but knack is only a contrivance. So I changed it to 'crack'. Strobilomyces 19:07, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edibility

[edit]

There's several statements in the edibility section which I am sure are true, but I'm struggling to find good references for them (cooking recommended, gastrointestinal problems caused by peppery species, pickling or parboiling for peppery species). I suppose that a good English-language handbook on mushrooms would be sufficient - can somebody help? Tylototriton (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Sasata (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Tylototriton (talk) 10:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture removal

[edit]

After reviewing the article, I feel it is a little bit too heavy in pictures. The Lactifluus clarkeae ("Placement of the family" section) and Lactarius lilacinus ("Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis" section) photos do not really illustrate any important information, they are merely example species after all. I would remove them - opinions? Tylototriton (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just did it finally... Looks better in my opinion. Tylototriton (talk) 17:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Russulaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Russulaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Russulaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tylototriton, a Dummy 101 query: if Nothofagus is a genus, how can it be used as Nothofagus zone? I'm not sure what that means. And should some of the text in the "Threats and conservation" section include "as of" dates? Some of the citations are over a decade old, so we should know to check if there are any changes in status or data on distribution. Also, per MOS:CURRENT, "Recent studies have found some traditional Russulaceae species ... " (cited to 2007) could probably have the "recent" replaced by the 2007 specifics. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:SandyGeorgia, thanks for reviewing. "Nothofagus zone" in this context could be replaced with "Nothofagus forests of Patagonia" (our "southern beech forests"). And agree, adding "as of" dates would be useful. Tylototriton (talk) 11:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]