Talk:The Nose (opera)

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Language & literature / Performing arts High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the performing arts in Russia task force.

Untitled

As an opera fan and a Shostakovich fan I gotta say, great that you guys started this. Unfortunately I have a gripe: probably the The Nose article should be the short story, which I am fairly certain is better known than the opera. How would you guys feel about moving this to The Nose (opera)? --Chinasaur 07:47, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Personally all I know of the story is from the opera, but then these things are very subjective. Are you planning to write an article on the story? We don't have many articles on individual stories, as opposed to books, so unless someone has a specific plan I doubt that one will materialise. Markalexander100 09:36, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Well, I don't think it's necessarily a subjective issue, but I agree it will be without more data. From my perspective I know only one person who has actually ever seen this opera, while I know about 10 people who have read the story. On the other hand, Shostakovich is more of a household name than Gogol, so perhaps the opera will come to dominate in the long run. Since someone has already put a synopsis of the opera plot here, and it looks pretty faithful to the story (from what I can remember) it does seem a little redundant to write an article on the story at this point. But definitely in the long run I think someone will end up writing an article on the story since it's interesting in the Gogol canon and historically. Anyway, I'll think about it and if I end up writing an article for the story then I'll move this and make the necessary links. Anyone else thinking about writing an article for the story could plan to do the same. --Chinasaur 18:09, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

That seems reasonable. Markalexander100 02:51, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Freudian "influence"

I removed a note about Freudian imagery in the plot since Gogol's story was written 20 years before Freud was born. I have to agree that many Gogol stories (Pushkin too) have elements that seem very Freudian. But I don't think we should call it that; more likely the detailed psychological characterizations of these authors influenced Freud (anybody looked into this?). If the opera has somehow additionally Freudianized the original story that might be worth mentioning, but from what I can tell the plot is pretty closely derived from Gogol.

I finally read the story last night to check up on Freud, and the plot is very close, but I've separated the pages to show the differences (mainly in structure). Markalexander100 02:48, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

1975 Recording under Rozhdestvensky

The article states that the 1975 Gennady Rozhdestvensky recording was released on Melodiya without libretto. In fact it was released on 2 LPs by EMI Melodiya as SLS 5088 with transliterated Russian text and English translation. It was the 2007 Melodiya rerelease on CD, coupled with The Gamblers, that had neither text nor translation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.173.183.83 (talk) 07:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Met Revival

Posted info re: Met Revival 2013 and HD Simulcast. I don't mean it as advertising, but it is an unusual opera that most people won't otherwise have a chance to see. 77.97.23.235 (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is reasonable under WP Opera guidelines - and you've even referenced it.Viva-Verdi (talk) 23:54, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Nose (opera). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111004035205/http://www.operaboston.org/operas_nose_specialfeatures.php to http://www.operaboston.org/operas_nose_specialfeatures.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:42, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]