Jump to content

Talk:Dirty Work (Rolling Stones album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More to follow

[edit]

(more to follow... no time right now)--Mikerussell 00:53, 2005 Apr 1 (UTC)

Charlie Watts

[edit]

From this article: Watts was reportedly not as involved in the sessions due to a period of rehab from alcohol and heroin addiction.

From his own article: Although formerly a smoker, Watts did not abuse harder drugs.

Um? Hoary 10:46, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

he told Ed Bradley on 60 Minutes in 1994 he was addicted to heroin as well as alcohol. You think he would lie to 60 minutes?--Mikerussell 03:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

alternative view of this album

[edit]

Hi--just wanted to offer a somewhat rosier view of this album, from a guy named Rob Brookman writing for 'Dancing About Architecture'. I'm not convinced that Dirty Work can be broadly referred to as the band's worst album. AndoDoug 09:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.dancingaboutarc.com/essays/codgeressay.html

"The Rolling Stones - Dirty Work

The Stones were close to splitting in 1985-86. And, really, who cared? '81's Tattoo You was already well ensconced in the playlists of classic rock stations, '84's Undercover proved the band capable of a truly bad album and Jagger's solo attempt She's the Boss uncovered the jaded sybarite many knew lay just beneath the surface. So when the boys put aside their tiff and quietly teamed up with Steve Lillywhite for the aptly-named Dirty Work, even the album's day-glo cover didn't make many record buyers look twice.

In retrospect, the album's frenetic recording schedule and relatively low-key marketing strategy should have become a blueprint, not an aberration. Dirty Work just plain sounds great, not like the polished cosmopolitanism of Tattoo You and not like anything the Stones had done before. The production is clean, even slick, but the guitars are punched up, the vocals mixed down, and Keith and Ron play like they're trying to flatten poor Mick. Mick, for his part, rises to the challenge, spitting out his lyrics, growling and generally sounding like the badass he once convinced a generation he was. If deep down, we really don't believe it, what the hell? For 10 solid songs, the Stones and Dirty Work entice us to play along and pretend it's 1966. In 1986, however, few were prepared to join in the game." AndoDoug 09:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DirtyWork86.jpg

[edit]

Image:DirtyWork86.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dirty Work (Rolling Stones album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Green tickY All the start class criteria

Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Green tickY At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year
Green tickY A casual reader should learn something about the album. Cavie78 (talk) 16:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article requirements:
Green tickY Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year.
Green tickY C: all of start and (1) cover art in infobox; (2) at least one additional section of prose; (3) track lengths & song authors in tracklist; (4) a personnel section including all musicians.

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment".

Last edited at 13:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 13:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dirty Work (The Rolling Stones album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aftermath (The Rolling Stones album) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This issue was resolved in September 2019 by moving page Dirty Work (The Rolling Stones album) to Dirty Work (Rolling Stones album). — CuriousEric 14:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dirty Work (The Rolling Stones album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dirty Work (The Rolling Stones album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dirty_Work_(Rolling_Stones_album)&oldid=1211170926"