Talk:Archibald Maule Ramsay

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Archibald Maule Ramsay article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archibald Maule Ramsay received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Reference required

is there a reference for this dubious statement "if Kent had given his stolen documents to Ramsay, it would have been impossible to prevent their publication, which could have stopped immediate escalation of war. At the time this was antithetical to the controllers of parliament."? If there is no reliable reference for this statement, then it is POV. Giacomo Returned 20:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a sentence of mine (or my assistant) followed by what I think is a rather dubious sentence of another ('the controllers of Parliament' carries a rather disturbing odour). The first sentence could, I think, be clarified by saying that this was what was in the mind of the authorities: Ramsay, who had Parliamentary privilege (so any speech of his could be reported without restriction), could have read out the copied cables in the House of Commons.

One useful source is a BBC Newsnight piece from 1982, when Robert Harris (then a broadcast journalist, now a famous author) tracked down an elderly Tyler Kent and interviewed him. This interview was the centrepiece of a 24 minute report on the whole Ramsay/Kent case which fortunately you can watch on Adam Curtis' BBC blog: Wicked leaks. Perhaps the section starting just before nine minutes in is the one which goes directly to the issue of the likely effects of the cables being published; at 14 minutes in, Kent talks about Capt Ramsay in general terms. Then at 17:22, he is asked "Did he (Ramsay) intend to do anything with the material?" Kent's answer is "Well yes, the whole idea was that it was (he was) thinking about bringing it up in Parliament".

Richard Griffiths' "Patriotism Perverted" (Constable, 1998), in effect if not in name a biography of Ramsay, explains the motivations on page 261 through the beliefs of Kent: "Kent believed Ramsay intended to use these documents to expose the Churchill-Roosevelt conspiracy in Parliament". Robin Thurlow in "Fascism in Britain" (I.B. Tauris, my edition is 1998 though there are others), on page 164, says directly "if Kent published his material in a pro-isolationist publication in the United States, or Maule Ramsay asked a question about it in the British Parliament, there was a real possibility that the secretly pro-interventionist Roosevelt would not be re-elected and that Churchill's government would fall". Sam Blacketer (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining. That's very interesting and I think it would be a good idea if that was explained and referenced in the article a little more clearly. I find the the pre-war and early war-time views of certian sections of British society towards Nazi Germany fascinating, I'm sure many others do too. So a few more notes and references would be realy helpful. Giacomo Returned 07:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]