User talk:Hhanke

Hello and Welcome! I hope you like the place. --mav

Culture of Spain

Hi, thought you might be interested in voting for Culture of Spain in the Collaboration of the week project, to help bring it up to a featured article. Thanks - Taxman 17:54, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)

== Hospitality Club ==--hhanke 20:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, the raw data for the graph can be found at here, the gnuplot script and shell script that generates it can be found here. As you can see from the data, the first bit sucks, this is because I had to "approximate" it from the out of date graph that is on the HC main site. Veit refuses to hand over more detailed information for unknown reasons, also refuses to include an updated graph on the site for other unknown reasons. If you can advise how to improve the graph, I would be very grateful. Thanks - FrancisTyers 10:26, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the data is here: [1] and the shell script is: [2]. I moved it a while ago. You're right that I should mention it in the caption. I'll do that now. :) - FrancisTyers 23:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag for Afshar Experiment

Can you please explain your reason for the POV tag in the talk page for the Afshar experiment?-- Prof. Afshar 20:57, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because people dispute the accuracy of the article, which you seem to regard as "your" article, insofar as when they try to make it NPOV or express criticisms, you revert it and waffle around it on the talk page. --Michael C Price 21:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Hhanke?! Interesting how you answered immediately before Hhanke himself! What would you wish to add to the article? I cannot ignore it when someone incorrectly describes the experiemtnand its scope. Rest assured I will continue to monitor for inaccuracies and errors. What I do is strcitly within the Wiki procedures and a number of admins have agreed with it. Regards.-- Prof. Afshar 21:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the rider "but not at the same time" about the wave vs particle behavour of the photons -- a statement that you admitted was correct on the talk page when you said "the measurements related to complementary wave and particle natures of light are performed in separate spacetime events"; yet you deleted my insert from the article (with the patronising comment "wrong again!"). You lack objectivity and are incapable of a NPOV. --Michael C Price 22:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In hope to clear misundarstandings and sort out the dispute, I've moved the above discussion (excluding the last post that was posted afterwards) to the talk page of the article. Peace. --hhanke 22:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hanke, do not take it personally because Afshar has the support of the admins, and one dozen of "fans" that are happy to keep his article. I personally have nominated the Afshar's article for deletion because it is "promo" and instead his work should be classified as pseudoscience. But at the present time the web fans of Afshar are much more, so to try to improve the original article is doomed to failure. Danko Georgiev MD 02:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danko, I think you should stop participating at work on this article and in discussions about it. Just as well as prof. Afshar should stop doing so. The dispute is lasting for long and nobody benefits from mutual war. Peace, if the article really needs fixing, somoby will do it. Prerequisite for that is you two stop doing what you are doing. That is my opinion. --hhanke 20:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Problem-geometry-1.png

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{Media by uploader}} or {{Presumed self}} tag(s) if present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Problem-geometry-2.png

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{Media by uploader}} or {{Presumed self}} tag(s) if present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Problem-geometry-1.png

The file File:Problem-geometry-1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image without obvious encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Problem-geometry-2.png

The file File:Problem-geometry-2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image without obvious encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]