Talk:East Turkestan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the East Turkestan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about East Turkestan. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about East Turkestan at the Reference desk.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Central Asia High‑importance

	Asia portal East Turkestan is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Limited recognition Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biased Heavily Toward Beijing

The whole article seems like it was written by a non-native speaker and it tilts heavily toward Beijing's interests. Jsensiba (talk) 00:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the things written in the article are supported by sources so there's no problem unless there is other information that isn't present AAAAA143222 (talk) 22:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xinjiang does not always mean "New Frontier"

The source attributed to the part of the article saying that Xinjiang means New Frontier comes from the National Palace Museum website of Taiwan, alleging that "The Qianlong emperor (1736-1796) named the region Xinjiang, for New Territory", but according to the Chinese wikipedia articles for Xinjiang and Xinjiang under Qing rule as cited by artsandcultures.google.com, Emperor Qianlong himself named Xinjiang with the meaning of old/original land newly returned. With that said, acknowledging that most English sources describe Xinjiang to mean "new frontier" and wikipedia is not always reliable, I believe it is worthwhile to confirm the meaning of Xinjiang. Thank you. Cycw (talk) 05:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources include:

Historical Matters Concerning Xinjiang: "In 1762, the Qing government established the post of Ili General and adopted a mechanism combining military and political administration. In 1884, it established a province and renamed the Western Regions as 'Xinjiang', meaning 'land newly returned'."

Is 'Xinjiang' a 'New territory'?: "To be precise, the definition of “Xinjiang” should be interpreted as “the original land newly returned”. Xinjiang is actually “the original land”, which has been under Chinese rule since the Han and Tang dynasties."

You may notice that these are both .cn sources, so some of you would not trust it for whatever reason. I have therefore also looked into non-Chinese sources, and this book has been cited to contain a reference to that. Unfortunately, due to this book's low availability, I have been unable to obtain the reference, so I would appreciate it if anyone could. Thank you. Cycw (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Uyghuristan into East Turkestan

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, but to convert Uyghuristan back to a dab, better reflecting its content. Klbrain (talk) 09:55, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The topic of East Turkestan discusses the use of this term within its Current status section, and I don't think that we have enough here to warrant two separate articles. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restore DAB at Uyghuristan instead. That article was a DAB for the multiple different usages of the term from 2018 (a redirect to Qocho before that) until a bold change in 2021. I’m not sure whether Qocho or East Turkestan is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, but Uyghuristan has definitely been used in RSes to refer to Qocho. For example,
The elite, primarily Buddhist, Turkic society centered in the south around Turpan became known as Uyghuristan from 932 to 1450, to distinguish it from the Muslim Türks living in the western parts of Xinjiang.
— Cuno, James. Who Owns Antiquity?‎. Princeton University Press. p. 107.
Absent the usage for Qocho though, this merge would have been a good alternative. — MarkH₂₁^talk 01:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be fine with dabifying the page. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Etymology part is clearly wrong

A document found in 1969 Astana, Turfan, which later named as Documents on the Sogdian Slave Trade during the Gochang period of the Koji clan (Japanese: 麹氏高昌国時代ソグド文女奴隷売買文書)[12][13] shows that in 639, the name Turkistan was used as this name of this land in the Sogdian word "twrkstn"[14][1]

the Wikipedia of "Turkestan" has same passage, and the modern term "East Turkestan" is not exactly equivalent to the medieval "Turkestan", this is a very controversial topic, the the Turkestan here apparently referring to the Mongolian Plateau or the Transoxiana, not the modern Tarim Basin, an area where the main ethnic groups are Eastern Iranian-speaking groups rather than Turkic-speaking groups at that time.some Chinese scholars even believe that this term isn’t word “Turkestan”. 王丁.粟特语高昌延相买婢契补考[J].国学学刊,2022,No.55(03):109-114+141.

It is unreasonable and misleading to directly state such a highly controversial topic as "the name Turkistan was used as this name of this land in the Sogdian word "twrkstn"",. 浅薄的 (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i agree AAAAA143222 (talk) 00:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the cited sources, which do not refer specifically here and actually explicitly refer to other areas (e.g. 具体的には天山山脈の北側,シル河からモンゴリアにまで至る広大な草原地帯を指したものであろう. [Specifically, it probably refers to the vast grasslands north of the Tianshan Mountains, extending from the Shir River to Mongolia.] from p.15 of this cited document). I have removed the contested part unless better well-referenced evidence can be provided. — MarkH₂₁^talk 17:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]