Talk:Gyeongui Line

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	February 9, 2009

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Commuter rail

Is it true that if you take the commuter rail version of this line then you're unable to transfer at Seoul Station to lines 1 & 4??68.197.102.240 (talk) 05:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed Shultz's claim, "In October 2004, the northern connection from the DMZ to Kaesong was finally completed." My Google search turned up nothing about this, and his edit summary of "I think I read in at least a few places that a North-South connection was finally made that time." didn't give me much confidence. If anyone can substantiate this claim, great, but please provide a source that can be verified. FreplySpang (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick search and found this: [1] (Brooke, James. "Mixed Messages on U.S. Role as Two Koreas Begin Joint Projects." New York Times, Late Ed. 8 Oct 2004, A11:1.), which talks of the unveiling of a South Korea to Kaesong rail route, and [2] (Brooke, James. "Commerce Sends South Korea Across DMZ." New York Times, Late Ed. 31 Oct 2005, A11:1.) which says that test trains were to begin running from S. Korea to Kaesong during the fall of '05 (no word on if they actually did). I have not, however, seen anything yet about routes from the rest of North Korea's half of the Gyeongui line to Kaesong, and the name "Gyeongui" never even comes up in the articles I cited. In case you need further info, I have access to the full text of both articles. -- Calcwatch 01:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This English-language Joongang Ilbo editorial from last month states that the promised test-run never took place: [3]... that certainly corresponds with my perceptions. However, it seems that the Seoul-Gaeseong stretch has been completed, and only awaits formal opening, which theoretically could come at any time. That is the claim made by Chung Dong-young in a recent Korean-language interview with NK Chosun. [4]-- Visviva 02:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gyeongui Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]