User talk:Superninja

Hello Superninja and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

PPS Nice spot on Classical Music Collectors.

Modular arithmetic

Thanks for your contributions to this article (and I hope you also contribute to advanced modular arithmetic theory, that article is a mess).

I have just one remark. On Wikipedia, they use Z instead of \mathbb{Z} for integers, as you can see on integer. I would suggest we put back Z on modular arithmetic. What do you think? Oleg Alexandrov 21:25, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Actually after changing the Zs I was wondering whether I should have. Personally I like the rendered math quite a bit better than HTML, plus I think the TeX is easier to read in the source, but I also don't want to change standard wikipedia formatting. --Superninja 20:52, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I also would prefer TeX any time. But when displayed, HTML text looks better than PNG images quite often. And indeed, the standard on Wikipedia is more biased towards Z rather than \mathbb{Z}. I will change that formula or two back to HTML some time soon.

BTW (if you have not yet done so), you should go check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics and put it on your watchlist. This is where all Wiki math talk is done. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov 21:17, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Implementation of optimized Growth-Method (Polyomino)

Is there an existing algorithm that proves this statement of the optimized growth method? I tried to implement it and the ordinary growth method works fine, but the optimized version doesn't compute the right results till now and I'm not shure if that is possible anyway.Devask 13:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vermiform

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vermiform, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Vermiform. Caerwine Caer’s whines 00:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Lothian moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Albert Lothian. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 11:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]