Talk:Haxey Hood

Haxey Hood was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 12, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Folklore

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mowbray's death

http://www.stirnet.com/HTML/genie/british/mm4fz/mowbray01.htm and http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/sources/mowbray/christiana1.shtml give Mowbray's death as October not Nov. I have changed accorsingl. Rich Farmbrough 17:40, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Nomination

I have assessed this a B and nominated for review as a good article. Would reviewers please not that I am nominating, but am not an author so am in no posisition to modify the text. --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 14:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Haxey Hood/GA1 for failure reason.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 20:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible citation material

http://www.isleofaxholme.net/haxey-hood.html may be useful http://www.information-britain.co.uk/customdetail.php?id=9 too http://www.britishpathe.com/video/old-time-haxey-hood-game --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 22:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

I have tried adding external links to the pubs involved in the game but someone is deleting the links. Quite frankly, the article is not well cited, nor are there many external links. Haxey Hood is a very special event. Make it easy for people to understand by linking to different websites that approach the contest from various perspectives. This certainly includes links to the pubs.24.11.170.191 (talk) 23:18, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There should be generally no external links in the article text, they should be in references or in the External links section. Though the External links section should be minimal and probably only contain a single link to the official site of the subject of the article. Keith D (talk) 23:41, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Haxey Hood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]