Talk:Toponymy

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anthroponymy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Linguistics: Etymology Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Etymology Task Force.

Archives

Archive 1

List of "New" place names

For reasons that even I can't fathom (*), I've suddenly become interested in places named after other places - but not just any old eponyms, only those that start with "New" (New England, New Zealand, New York .....). I assumed, on the WP:WHAAOE principle, that we'd already have a list of such places, but if we do, I can't find it.

If one were to create such a list, what would be the best title: List of place names starting with "New"? I'm sure we could improve on that.

(*) I recently got to wondering which "New" place is the closest to its parent place (if that's the right term), and that train of thought has lead me here. But why I was wondering that in the first place, ...... Ah, the creative process at work in all its ineffable and majestic beauty. -- Jack of Oz ^{[your turn]} 23:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, just the kind of geotrivia I'm a sucker for. My first thought--beside wondering if such a list would long survive or be deleted--was about Nova Scotia and other "New" place names that don't use the English word "New". But I can't think offhand how to describe such a list. As far as the closest "old" and "new" places, I would guess there must be many cities with old and new parts, and so named. The first that comes to mind is Laredo, Texas and Nuevo Laredo, adjoining along the US-Mexico border. Pfly (talk) 05:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stewart has a classification of place names in his Book "Names on the Globe". He calls them either "Shift-Names" (place names which relate to other places on the globe) or commemorative names (names with the purpose to preserve some memory, but that also includes, for example, "Vancouver"). --ZielGruppe (talk) 08:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think Jack had a good idea with "List of place names starting with 'New,'" or maybe just "Place names including 'New'" to make it more of an article than a straight-up list. Simple, straightforward, exactly what someone else interested in the subject would type in the search box. Also, since this is the English language Wikipedia, I don't think it's such a big deal to just use the word "New" in the title; there's no reason that should preclude discussing places using non-English variations like Nuevo and Nova. I'd recommend against using "shift-names" or "commemorative names" as the title or even as a re-direct as they seem like broader topics, unless it was made into a proper article (rather than a list), as the terms could then be discussed properly. Milhisfan (talk) 05:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In "Place names including 'New'" there would be an awful lot of places called Newton, Newport, Newcastle...... etc. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, so we'd need to confine it to usages of the form "New <space> <Parent name>". Newfoundland wouldn't qualify, but if there were a place called Foundland and somewhere else was named New Foundland, directly after Foundland, that would qualify. Creating a list of these places is pretty easy; coming up with a really good article title is the real challenge. -- ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ ^{[your turn]} 06:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed for usage pattern

I've added a cn tag to the statement "toponym has come to replace 'place-name' in professional discourse among geographers." It may be true, but I wasn't able to confirm it here or here vs. here (place name vs. toponym = 32,300 vs. 12,300 hits). Doremo (talk) 09:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Toponymy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where to list the orgs that defined toponymies of places?

Where can I find out more info about the different organizations who define the names of places, such as US Federal Information Processing Standards, Google Maps policies or United Nationas and any notable discrepancies/methodologies? Shushugah (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What about peninsulas?

What would you call names of peninsulas, capes, headlands or promontories? "Promonyms"? "Peninsulonyms"? -- Denelson 83 08:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]