Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fart physics
Perhaps part of this could be merged into a fluid and gas dynamics article, but apart from that I don't think this is at risk of becoming encyclopaedic. --fvw* 01:11, 2005 Jan 8 (UTC)
- Delete, not even funny enough for BJAODN. — Ливай | ☺ 02:36, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, neither funny nor encyclopedic. Rje 02:44, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, prank, vanity, not funny. Somebody in the WWW 02:50, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Peee-yew, this article stinks. Ha ha ha. Or should I call it a farticle? Ha ha ha. Redirect to 1601 (Mark Twain). Ha ha ha. (Prank, not encyclopedic). Dpbsmith (talk) 03:05, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Other than it being a bad-joke it's arguement also has many fatal flaws which are not worth exposing or humouring. Greaser 06:05, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Probably nothing to merge, but if someone wants to, feel free. Tuf-Kat 02:31, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC) (oops, I failed at signing, but this was my vote)
- Delete Simply stupid. CiaraBeth 17:39, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I already speedy deleted this once. Delete. RickK 00:58, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. There are a few funny fart jokes out there. This is not one of them. Edeans 08:32, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- It's a verifiable encyclopedic fact that the last funny fart joke was made in 1880.
- Delete as a pointless bad joke. Thryduulf 23:38, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as vandalism, unless someone's going to endow a chair. Cleduc 08:58, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete pardon me if I don't laugh. --Deathphoenix 05:10, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete The person who wrote this should delete it... remember the rolling down the window example? Pedant 06:10, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, What the...? Riffsyphon1024 21:38, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)