User talk:Joeclark

closed-caption query on Entertainment reference desk

FYI: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment#Closed captioning of foreign words (permanent link). --Mathew5000 21:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility policy

The new Accessibility WikiProject is currently trying to convert the old WP:ACCESS guideline into an official policy (i.e. accessibility changes are not only recommended, but should be enforced in the Wikipedia). Maybe you want to participate in the discussion. Best regards, —surueña 20:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Screenfont

An article that you have been involved in editing, Screenfont , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Critterbane (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Screenfont

The article Screenfont has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This WP:NEOLOGISM isn't used in any reliable sources, and the article is little more than a WP:DICDEF.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 02:37, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]