Talk:Lionel, LLC

Breaking the article in two?

Due to the historical significance of the original Lionel Corporation and the vehement allegiance of its fans, I propose breaking the article in two, the first to cover the original Lionel Corporation era, and the second to cover the General Mills - Lionel, LLC era. --Gary D 07:25, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

That would probably make things a little less confusing, although the 1969-2004 era will be a much shorter article. I'll see if I can get a chance to break the article later today. --Dave Farquhar 13:47, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Good job! I think this really works better, representing the true state of corporate affairs more accurately and allowing for unambiguous use of the "defunct companies" category. --Gary D 19:52, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Thanks. I agree this works better, and I have to say I was surprised how much there actually is to say about post-1969 Lionel. --Dave Farquhar 21:00, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

We have a train collection that has been given to us. There are some that are from before 1969. How do we determine the value of the trains?

Neil Young

Wasn't Neil Young heavily involved in the company in the Kughn era? I read a biography of Neil and he obviously held some shares and took a lively interest in the design of the trains and their electronic sound emulation. Strausszek August 23, 2006 04:40 (CET)

I really dislike how the article refers to Neil Young as "Rock star..." That's a mis-statement as Young is a muscian which is so much more than a "Rock Star." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.15.255.227 (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Break in tone in Wellspring era?

Noting that the paragraph "In early 2002, Lionel decided to put out fantastic models in black boxes that read "Joshua Lionel Cowen Series". The JLC Series ran from 2002–2012 as a 10-year anniversary for Lionel's first CEO and president, Joshua Lionel Cowen. It became a hit with collectors" either needs a strong citation or needs to be rewritten to attribute the "fantastic" judgment to critics or customers/collectors, not the article/author.

mattclare (talk) 13:32, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lionel logo.jpg

Image:Lionel logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lionel logo.jpg

Image:Lionel logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)