Jump to content

User talk:Dbachmann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


User talk:Dbachmann/Archive 43

Fake Royalties Of India in Wikipedia

[edit]

You may look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kameshwar_Singh and his predecessors who were officialy Zamindars (landlords) and never real Kings, they were never admitted into the Chamber of Princes (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_of_Princes). I belong to that region and I do not want to quarrel with that family which was the biggest landlord of India and Kshatra Singh (Thakur) had boughgt the title Maharaja in the beginning of 19th century but this family never had any State or boundary. Vinay Jha

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Dbachmann. Thank you for your work on 15th millennium BC. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Part of the template:Millennia series, and so while stand-alone notability is borderline I think that its worth completing for completeness of the series. It would, of course, be a good idea to expand using reliable sources ...

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

[edit]

Dear Dbachmann,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Burney Relief

[edit]

Burney Relief has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]