Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morningstar, Inc.

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:58, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Morningstar, Inc.

Looks like an ad. JoaoRicardo 07:12, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Morningstar is the most prominent financial analysis company. 128.135.223.61 06:56, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)jvanscoy
Comment: This was apparently never listed on vfd, so I'm putting it on today's page. —Korath (Talk) 02:18, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Keep Passes the google test, all related. Further looking shows it is quite an important company. 02:28, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Very well known and important company in its field. Sheldrake 02:36, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Very important company. Feco 03:52, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep, well-known company. Rhobite 05:07, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and expand. Well-known company. Capitalistroadster 00:21, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Very important company. JuntungWu 14:00, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Household word in investments. Their "style boxes" are used universally. Their star ratings are frequently cited (particularly in ads by companies with good ratings). As well known as, say Value Line. Current article is a not-impossibly-bad stub. Would be well worth expanding. Does not read as promotional language to me. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:43, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Definitely worth keeping, though the page is extremely sparse. I actually came to learn how the rating system worked (1-3? 1-5?) but found there to be no info as of yet. Crick22 10:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.