Jump to content

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant

Coordinates: 31°13′23″N 85°6′42″W / 31.22306°N 85.11167°W / 31.22306; -85.11167
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Generating Station
Construction activities at the Joseph M. Farley Power Plant.
Map
Official nameJoseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant
CountryUnited States
LocationDothan, Alabama
Coordinates31°13′23″N 85°6′42″W / 31.22306°N 85.11167°W / 31.22306; -85.11167
StatusOperational
Construction beganOctober 1, 1970 (1970-10-01)
Commission dateUnit 1: December 1, 1977
Unit 2: July 30, 1981
Construction cost$4.115 billion (2007 USD)[1]
OwnerAlabama Power
OperatorSouthern Nuclear
Nuclear power station
Reactor typePWR
Reactor supplierWestinghouse
Cooling towers6 × Mechanical Draft
Cooling sourceChattahoochee River
Thermal capacity2 × 2775 MWth
Power generation
Units operational1 × 874 MW
1 × 883 MW
Make and modelWH 3-loop (DRYAMB)
Nameplate capacity1757 MW
Capacity factor96.18% (2017)
85.50% (lifetime)
Annual net output14,982 GWh (2021)
External links
WebsitePlant Farley
[edit on Wikidata]

The Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Generating Plant is located near Dothan, Alabama, in the southern United States. The twin-unit nuclear power station sits on a largely wooded and agricultural 1,850-acre (750 ha) site along the Chattahoochee River, approximately 5 miles (8.0 km) south of Columbia, Alabama, in Houston County.

History

[edit]

The plant is named after the late Joseph McConnell Farley, an American attorney born in Birmingham, Alabama, who became president of Alabama Power (owner of the facility) from 1969 to 1989 and was later CEO of Southern Nuclear Operating Company; both companies are subsidiaries of Southern Company.

Construction of the plant began in 1970. Fluor Corporation of Irving, Texas was the general contractor. Unit 1 achieved commercial operation in December 1977. Unit 2 began commercial operation in July 1981. The total cost of the plant was about $1.57 billion. On May 12, 2005, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved license renewal applications for both reactors at the site. Unit 1's extended operating license is set to expire on June 25, 2037 and Unit 2's on March 31, 2041.

Technology

[edit]

This plant has two Westinghouse reactors.

  • Unit 1: 2,821 MWt
  • Unit 2: 2,821 MWt

Both units are three-loop pressurized water reactors. The facility is cooled using six mechanical draft cooling towers supplied by water from the Chattahoochee River.[2]

Electricity Production

[edit]
Generation (MWh) of Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant[3]
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual (Total)
2001 1,272,449 1,024,560 631,182 601,606 1,015,546 1,120,971 1,242,453 1,243,931 1,210,190 721,817 850,739 1,224,872 12,160,316
2002 1,264,235 1,152,381 1,266,258 1,212,829 1,203,778 1,199,073 1,234,644 1,229,609 845,801 604,939 1,231,118 1,240,922 13,685,587
2003 1,278,594 1,150,277 1,196,601 607,222 1,139,920 1,207,113 1,205,537 1,241,148 1,212,396 1,268,783 1,190,810 1,283,597 13,981,998
2004 1,281,366 1,197,109 808,327 862,698 1,270,211 1,233,926 1,260,644 1,261,983 1,197,407 641,474 845,434 1,287,406 13,147,985
2005 1,286,064 1,163,063 1,286,011 1,225,931 1,239,120 1,170,429 1,270,228 1,270,240 1,194,870 846,957 604,440 1,180,984 13,738,337
2006 1,285,930 1,166,273 1,261,211 747,544 744,269 1,226,035 1,227,993 1,270,840 1,238,166 1,287,521 1,249,468 1,334,372 14,039,622
2007 1,294,107 1,169,312 1,286,823 754,231 792,223 1,243,338 1,280,338 1,263,477 1,195,090 577,333 948,954 1,292,641 13,097,867
2008 1,290,834 1,209,205 1,290,834 1,221,983 1,283,906 1,238,178 1,084,548 1,230,776 1,237,470 985,916 703,399 1,296,176 14,073,225
2009 1,297,319 1,172,334 1,081,158 608,402 1,097,428 1,210,526 1,274,036 1,273,252 1,230,588 1,279,768 1,159,324 1,289,442 13,973,577
2010 1,288,051 1,159,228 1,272,447 673,223 857,479 1,231,417 1,253,408 1,264,536 1,217,369 800,068 833,964 1,318,494 13,169,684
2011 1,321,174 1,052,842 1,309,802 1,225,578 1,293,714 1,229,322 1,286,431 1,283,854 1,252,882 814,757 1,026,238 1,334,656 14,431,250
2012 1,213,424 1,246,133 1,269,067 696,509 1,318,959 1,272,736 1,226,176 1,307,855 1,272,839 1,319,812 1,285,228 1,334,239 14,762,977
2013 1,332,572 1,202,452 1,280,685 834,968 1,096,538 1,209,205 1,300,381 1,296,728 1,190,963 737,553 1,285,092 1,330,885 14,098,022
2014 1,248,497 1,203,184 1,325,343 1,284,984 1,274,501 1,265,157 1,307,929 1,308,761 1,266,006 906,219 861,176 1,253,632 14,505,389
2015 1,337,312 1,208,275 1,212,658 637,046 958,216 1,266,847 1,301,327 1,306,715 1,272,271 1,324,674 1,124,550 1,331,797 14,281,688
2016 1,341,773 1,252,945 1,328,747 818,623 1,023,936 1,215,425 1,307,658 1,304,362 1,268,047 657,319 841,701 1,326,720 13,687,256
2017 1,318,200 1,198,063 1,322,958 1,279,626 1,314,487 1,266,180 1,303,580 1,302,841 1,270,068 955,678 941,953 1,330,460 14,804,094
2018 1,332,915 1,182,137 1,190,346 674,758 973,681 1,251,061 1,305,794 1,305,374 1,113,057 1,117,192 1,286,739 1,331,992 14,065,046
2019 1,334,603 1,036,534 1,328,289 758,420 1,218,560 1,267,483 1,307,288 1,309,208 1,176,881 766,288 1,296,974 1,336,434 14,136,962
2020 1,336,316 1,248,847 1,326,947 1,262,135 1,323,766 1,270,401 1,307,212 1,306,926 1,268,701 865,323 928,943 1,330,280 14,775,797
2021 1,339,121 1,209,947 1,081,831 764,430 1,340,735 1,273,195 1,331,085 1,331,700 1,293,514 1,341,243 1,318,239 1,357,897 14,982,937
2022 1,366,204 1,229,072 1,357,085 830,566 1,231,717 1,288,965 1,337,525 1,252,017 964,002 670,261 646,571 814,211 12,988,196
2023 1,363,930 1,143,258 1,358,025 1,310,255 1,351,055 1,144,366 1,332,577 1,331,142 1,296,249 819,392 940,608 1,367,672 14,758,529
2024 1,367,565 1,210,979 1,360,112 780,861 1,077,914 1,294,159 1,335,616 1,326,392 9,753,598

Ownership

[edit]

Surrounding population

[edit]

The NRC defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[4]

The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Farley was 11,842, an increase of 8.0 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 421,374, an increase of 6.1 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Dothan (17 miles to city center).[5]

Seismic risk

[edit]

The NRC's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Farley was 1 in 35,714, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[6][7]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "EIA - State Nuclear Profiles". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 3 October 2017.
  2. ^ http://www.eia.gov/nuclear/state/alabama/index.cfm EIA State Nuclear Profiles; Alabama Nuclear Profile 2010 Accessed 4 August 2013
  3. ^ "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2023-01-08.
  4. ^ "NRC: Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Power Plants". Archived from the original on 2006-10-02. Retrieved 2012-03-14.
  5. ^ "Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors". NBC News. 2011-04-14. Retrieved 2024-08-16.
  6. ^ "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk". NBC News. 2011-03-16. Retrieved 2024-08-16.
  7. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-25. Retrieved 2011-04-19.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_M._Farley_Nuclear_Plant&oldid=1254260487"