Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limp

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Golbez 04:46, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Limp

Delete. Dictionary definition already transwikied to Wiktionary, no encyclopedic scope. Physchim62 21:37, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, could be expanded to include causes and treatments. Kappa 21:42, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, expand... limps are used as stage devices by actors. -- BDAbramson ^thimk 01:57, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
keep. I've added some material on medical interpretation of limping. Sure, it's nothing but a stub right now, but has the makings of a great article. Robinh 12:01, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP. generally speaking, just about every non-proper noun can be made into a decent article. Kingturtle 19:51, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

All I can say is Wow. We have entire textbooks on this single condition.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]