Jump to content

Talk:Jessamyn West (writer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Closed deletion listing

[edit]

An article corresponding to the contents of this article and Jessamyn Charity West was listed for deletion on April 3, 2005. During the course of the discussion the article was split into two. The discussion is now closed and the result was keep both. You can read the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jessamyn West. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 15:00, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No article about her novel?

[edit]

There are articles about the minor movie made from her novel, and even about the theme song from the movie; but none about the prize-winning novel that inspired both and got such critical attention that she gets an article here. --Orange Mike 13:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jessamyn West (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jessamyn West (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 March 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus for move, (non-admin closure)Ammarpad (talk) 05:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


WP:TWODABS. I honestly don't care which of the two bios goes to the main article but it's senseless to have a disambiguation page with two entries. Move one and leave a hatnote. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 22:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: just a gentle reminder that if this request is granted, Jessamyn West (disambiguation) must also be deleted. PI Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 04:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your support is equally as perplexing as this move request itself. Neither is in accordance with the guideline, WP:TWODABS, which is common practice on Wikipedia and in agreement with community consensus. If you want to change the guideline, then this is not the correct venue; try the talk page of the guideline for that. OR... you can provide evidence that the writer should be considered as the primary topic over the librarian. PI Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 13:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Hi I'm one of the JWs. It seems that the two of us are more or less equally notable so the policy seems clear. I do agree that it's not great UX to send everyone to a disambiguation page, but that seems like it should point to a shift in policy,not in this particular example. Jessamyn (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.