Talk:Counterintelligence
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Counterintelligence article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Archived discussion
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Counterintelligence vs. Counter-intelligence? The community uses the former.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.210.45 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 28 May 2005
why is "mole hunt" not an artical or a redirrect to this artical, and can someone take care of that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.15.127.225 (talk) 04:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Razu859035 (talk) 16:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]Counter-intelligence → Counterintelligence – more common usage (even in this article) Akrabbim 20:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- [copied from WP:RM by James F. (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)]
Survey
[edit]- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Oppose; this looks like an AE/BE issue, here. James F. (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Add any additional comments
If it's really a matter of AE/BE differences or similar (which I'm guessing is the case), then so long as there's a redirect from the other name, it doesn't matter which name is used. Andrewa 00:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
AFAIK it is. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Military c-e
[edit]In many countries army has its own c-e, see Główny Zarząd Informacji Wojska Polskiego in Communist Poland. Xx236 15:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Spelling!!
[edit]Counterintelligence is ONE word... Not hyphenated.
Spelling X2
[edit]Counterintelligence is ONE word... Not hyphenated. I would agree.
Counterintelligence
[edit]Counterintelligence is a very important word, when you are planning to take action against any hostile enemies. For an example, during the vietnam war. There was a large movement of China Red Army, estimation unknown, destination unknown. Because of the forest covering the Loas, and other parts of that area. The China Red Army vanished the satelite. We didn't know where they were. So, the U.S. Army in Vietnam were notified by the Washington to search for a heavy resistence or heavy concentration of the resistence inside of Loas. U.S. Army iniated a search and destory mission within the Target Area. U.S. Army counterintelligence did reported that there was a very concentration of resistence somewhere in Loas. U.S. Air force initiated carpet bombing using 50 B-52's High Attitude Jet Bombers for 5 days. After the bombing, on April 26, 1972-everything was quiet at the western front. We won Vietnam on that date, we were not to win the war based upon the population control for Vietnam. Frankly, We Won, We Lost the War, Just to Answer the Population Control. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesuitmilitarychaplain (talk • contribs) 23:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Dividing out the sections
[edit]Recommend moving Offensive Counterintelligence to OFCO and creating a separate entry. The same with counterespionage (CE) and other activities such as CFSO and formerly LLSO and MSO.
Could Edward Snowdens archives have led us to this point? Explanation of situation in Ukraine, and loss of 'sea range' in pacific theatre indicates resource grabs indicative of global conflict. Pre emptive knowledge of Ukraine coup smells of merge plot.
[edit]74.81.235.84 (talk) 14:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC) Timeline to disclosure in question... If he was an inactive Russian explain the later leak of coup favorite on timeline with other leaks... Then determine the value of information sold to China by Vlady. Well worth exorbitant fee. Even if idiot was clean KGB would drain the library from him without his knowing.74.81.235.84 (talk) 14:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC) I would.74.81.235.84 (talk) 14:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Counterintelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926133058/http://www.sis.gov.uk:80/output/sis-or-mi6-what-s-in-a-name.html to https://www.sis.gov.uk/output/sis-or-mi6-what-s-in-a-name.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010091345/https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/docs/v13i2a05p_0001.htm to https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/docs/v13i2a05p_0001.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123014953/http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf to http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Facebook 173.59.35.25 (talk) 02:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Unclear short desc and misleadingly limited first sentence
[edit]The Cambridge Dictionary described counter intelligence as 'secret action taken by a country to prevent another country from discovering its military, industrial, or political secrets'. I suggest changing changing the short description from 'Offensive measures using enemy information' to e.g. 'Action to counter espionage'. I suggest changing the first sentence of the lead from 'Counterintelligence (counter-intelligence) or counterespionage (counter-espionage) is any activity aimed at protecting an agency's intelligence program from an opposition's intelligence service.' to e.g. 'Counterintelligence (counter-intelligence) or counterespionage (counter-espionage) is any activity aimed at protecting a country's secrets and intelligence operations from foreign or subversive intelligence services.' I shall likely not participate in any discussion of this. Jontel (talk) 08:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)