Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pontdolgoch
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the pages entitled Pontdolgoch and Caersws.
This page is kept as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to keep the article.
Two sub-stubs that only say that each are small villages in Wales. Went for speedy delete, but the author removed the notice. I certainly would support a motion to see them expanded since they're real places, but these are just unencyclopedic as is. Anyone feeling up to the task? - Lucky 6.9 19:06, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Legitimate stub. ElBenevolente 19:53, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep all articles about real places, no matter how stubby, so long as they're true. RickK 20:33, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
- keep I realise they are fairly bare now, but i am and will add to them (and they definately are real places... i promise!) ahadley 18:38, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - appear to be real, and there's a consensus on keeping real places. -- Cyrius|✎ 22:20, May 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - real places. In the case of the Caersws article I see the VfD notice was slapped on 8 minutes after the stub was created: this is far too soon anyway -- contributors must be given a chance to flesh out articles. -- Arwel 23:01, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
- Hmm...I should have looked at the time stamp. Sorry 'bout dat. I drop my delete vote, but I'd still like to see more than just "a very small village in Wales." Keep as stub. - Lucky 6.9 16:15, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.