User talk:Aydee

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

You might find these pages useful:

How to edit a page

How to write a great article

Article naming conventions

Wikipedia's Manual of Style

You can always experiment in the sandbox.

If you have any questions, see help, leave a question at the help desk, or feel free to drop me a line on my talk page.

Thanks again and happy editing!

— Trilobite (Talk) 10:25, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Welcome from further south

Hello, newly-listed WP Kiwi! Interested in games and tetration, I see. Any time you want to rechannel your enthusiasm briefly, there's a Maori language encyclopedia (mentioning Auckland) that anyone can look at and contribute to! By the way, there are lots of useful things you can add to your User page, such as quick links. Kia ora. Robin Patterson 00:45, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Bureaucratship

Thanks for your supportive vote of my bureaucratship. Unfortunately, the vote was judged to be too close, but I hope you'll support me when I run again. :) Andre (talk) 16:00, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)

The Humungous Image Tagging Project

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Birthday!

Dunno if you're still active, but... User:Jenmoa/birthday --User:Jenmoa 00:34, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucratship

I'm letting you know that I've just nominated myself for bureaucratship for the second time. If you didn't care to know about this, I apologize for the inconvenience. Andre (talk) 02:37, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Aydee. Thank you so much for your support and kind words on my bureaucratship nomination. Unfortunately, it didn't pass, but I intend to run again soon. If you'd like to be informed next time around, please let me know on my talk page. Thanks again! Andre (talk) 05:12, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Hey You

First things first, what vandalism? I have not been vandalsing. My edits are of the highest quality you know. I demand you to show me wat vandalism?????? --HelloolleH 13:10, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey You (Part 2)

Ok, the Fred Plokowski article is rea, the guy exists, so it isnt vandalism. Stupid Land is an island just off Spain, its just that u have never heard of it because it was discovered yesterday. And, I didnt steal that guys userpage, I borrowed it with his permission. I hope that answers your questions and enquries. --HelloolleH 13:25, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey You (Part 3)

OMFG WAT VANDALISM??? MY EDITS ARE NOT VANDALISM- GIVE REASONS Y U THINK MY EDITS R VANDALISM???!!!!?? --HelloolleH 13:36, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, thanks for helping to combat the ongoing vandalism to the Dream Theater article. Hopefully the same isn't happening with the Rush article too. Are you a fan of either or both bands, or do you just look for vandalism in general? Durga2112 11:35, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the same guy is back at it again tonight, making (I believe) the exact same edits he made to both the Rush and DT pages yesterday. Do you know if there are any effective ways of dealing with this type of vandal, other than continually reverting to previous versions? The thing that makes this tricky (to me) is that this vandal has been doing the same thing under several different IP addresses, so I don't know if an IP ban would even be effective in this case, as he could apparently just come back under a different IP. And a fan of Dream Theater who hasn't heard any Rush? That needs to be rectified immediately. ;) Good albums to start off with are Permanent Waves and Moving Pictures. Durga2112 04:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DVD+R/W's RfA

Thank you for your support in my RfA, which ended with the result of (74/0/0). If there is anything I can help with feel free to ask. Also, if there is anything I am doing wrong, please point that out as well. I look forward to working with you in the future.

Highest regards, DVD+ R/W 02:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support

Dear Aydee,
Thank you very much for your support on my recent RfA. I am pleased to announce that it passed with a tally of 72/11/1, and I am now an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the tools, but please let me know if there are any admin jobs I can do to help you, now or in the future. —Cuivi é nen 02:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

Thanks for voting!
Hello Aydee, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care.

--Pilot|guy 22:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Aydee, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Jorcoga^ETC. 01:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, Aydee!

Have a good one :) -Ladybirdintheuk 12:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Aydee, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Have a good day Adamcobb 17:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean K. Reynolds

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sean K. Reynolds, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kevin (talk) 02:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message regarding your use of the No Multi License Template

In case you are not aware, the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed that the copyright licensing terms on the wikis operated by the WMF – including Wikipedia – be changed to include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license in addition to the current GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) as allowed by version 1.3 of the GFDL. The community has approved this change with 75.8% in favor, and on June 15, 2009, the change will take effect.
You currently have {{NoMultiLicense}} on your user or user talk page, which states that your edits are licensed under the GFDL only. On or before June 15, this template will be changed to reflect Wikipedia's new licensing terms. If you accept the licensing change, you do not need to do anything (and feel free to remove this message); if you do not accept it, we regret that you will no longer be able to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#NoMultiLicense template if you have any comments.

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 20:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC) for the Village pump. Report errors here. [reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean K. Reynolds

The article Sean K. Reynolds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no third party sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]