Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Scrimes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - should be merged - SimonP 19:07, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete - nice try but I don't think he's quite notable enough Mariocki TALK 01:46, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate in recent election for BC Parliament for the BC Marijuana party. Aren't we merging minor party candidates for state legislatures into lists? Meelar (talk) 01:57, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
- If there's an ongoing project to merge minor party candidates then I'm happy to change to a merge -- Mariocki TALK 02:07, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- My vote too. Samaritan 09:18, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If there's an ongoing project to merge minor party candidates then I'm happy to change to a merge -- Mariocki TALK 02:07, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. Megan1967 06:00, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. Lack of notability is not an agreed grounds for deletion. There are omnibus articles being created for other minor party candidates. (Oddly, the election hasn't taken place yet, so the article is written in the future past tense, I guess.) Ground Zero 14:51, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge into a List of minor candidates in the 2005 BC Parliment elections. Klonimus 17:50, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it should be merged to Marijuana Party candidates, 2005 British Columbia provincial election. There are a ridiculous number of minor parties in BC (far more than in any other Canadian province), and a list for *all* such candidates could get VLVQ (ie. very large, very quickly). CJCurrie 00:04, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete failed political candidates with no other claim to fame - which is, by the way, pretty rare. Most people have something noteworthy to talk about before they run for office. The fact that this person doesn't is telling. Rossami (talk) 00:49, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --Spinboy 03:59, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, NN. Radiant_* 09:40, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.