Talk:Vertical loop

Amusement Parks: Roller Coasters High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

Are y'sure L'Hospital's quinticde l'hospital/quintique de l'hospital.shtml doesn't get used? (Wish I knew its English name.) 142.177.24.163 03:49, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

corrected link —Tamfang (talk) 01:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

corkscrew vs revolution

the corkscrew at knott's berry farm also claims to be the first modern steel looping coaster, also opened in 1975. Anyone who knows which is true could maybe put a note in explaining the discrepancy? wimbledon andy 14:28, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

High G-forces really the cause for injuries?

Were the high G-forces (>6 G) of a circular loop really the main source for injuries? I would suspect another mechanism: If the a more or less straight track is followed by a circular loop there not only a sudden onset of maximum G-forces but also an extreme angular acceleration: The car (and the passenger sitting inside) is forced to a fast rotation at once. Due to inertia the passenger's head is pulled foward when the loop starts and forced backwards at the exit. Especially the forward pull may cause neck injuries similar to those after a (moderate) car crash. The "Thriller" coaster is an example that near-circular loops are possible if the entrances and the exits are made clothoide-shaped. The G-forces of 6.5 G were slightly higher than at the "Nessie"-Loop (Hansa-Park Sierksdorf, Germany, 5.6 G) or the Olympia Looping (5.2 G).--SiriusB 14:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parametric Graph?

What is the purpose of this graphic? Either it has a purpose in explaining the clothoid loop and should be mentioned in the article or it doesn't and should be removed. Riph (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. The term "clothoid" has led to confusion, we should not use it unless it can be properly backed up with an etymology and parametric equation; whatever it is, it is not a Cornu spiral! -- The Anome (talk) 11:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've now added a sourced explanation of the term "clothoid loop". It uses sections from the Cornu spiral, and should not be confused with the clothoid itself. The image stays removed: it seems not to be an illustration of either. -- The Anome (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flight manoeuvre

Every single interwiki-linked article is about a flight manoeuvre, and this article is about rollercoasters. Is it a joke? This article should be unlinked from the others. Wizardist (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the interwiki links need to be updated, in that case. That use would be included at Aerobatic maneuver—there isn't nearly enough burden to make "Vertical loop" redirect to the aerobatics page. czar · · 04:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vertical loop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928033013/http://www.eap-magazin.de/index.php?id=127&L=1 to http://www.eap-magazin.de/index.php?id=127&L=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]