Talk:Prince-abbot
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sub-stub
[edit]Singularly free of hard information. Not even a link to prince bishop. --Wetman 22:42, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Requested move 8 May 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No conseus to move. This has been open for a few weeks now and only recieved 1 oppose vote. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Prince-abbot → Prince-Abbot – Please see way of writing the word in the article, and the reasons behind it. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 01:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – where are the reasons for caps explained? It looks like sources mostly use lowercase prince-abbot. Dicklyon (talk) 02:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Stub-Class former country articles
- Stub-Class Holy Roman Empire articles
- Unknown-importance Holy Roman Empire articles
- Holy Roman Empire task force articles
- WikiProject Former countries articles
- Stub-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- Stub-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages