User talk:Peterak
Question
[edit]Hey there, I am just wondering about what you mean when you say on your user page "Currently I am working on my masters degree in the History of Religion, my topic is the Armenian G. I. Gurdjieff and Gurdjieffian groups." Could you clarify it for me please. Thanks Aeuio 19:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's an interesting situation you are in. You probably know more about these groups than me.:) If you think that something should be changed on the G. page then I guess you'd be a good person for that. (There are some sections that could be better).
- Concerning my sentence on my user page, to sum it up the main 2 points for you: 1) I tend to read and focus on books about Gurdjieff's ideas and not on documentaries and other wiseacrings on what is/did happen. and 2) I am not representing myself as some Gurdjieff expert (i got tired of being accused of this - I don't know where people get that from).
- Anyhow, good luck with your thesis. Aeuio 20:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Your suggestion about incorporating the criticism into the article sounds good but I don't think it can be done (especially with the "other views" section that's there). The criticism section creates a sort of a balance for the different views; and since no one is throwing a commotion about npov I'd rather just leave it alone. Aeuio 19:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
This is an article you worked on, it is now up for deletion. Ikip (talk) 18:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Peterak. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Peterak~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
02:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Peterak. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Peterak. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)