This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Is there any proof this? Can I see a quote? Sounds kind of silly to me, personally. I would think if they were going to create a mythology, they would probably name every part of it. Tolkien did it, why can't they?--ATrivedi 16:50, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Not necessarily. It might have been a symbol of acknowledgement that there might be other gods outside of the ones they already know. Ausir 18:22, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I have a very high interest in different mysteries that are through out the Bible. This is one of them. I really believe that it is quite possible that Greek mythology is connected to a Scripture in the book of Genesis in where it speaks about the Sons of God came in the daughters of men and the created giants in the land. If you really think about it, those giants would called in Greek mythology demi gods. The reasoning for this is because the Hebrew work that is used for Sons of God is both human and angelic. This is present when the three angels visit Abraham later on in Genesis. They were also in human form before Abraham. One of the things I have read at one time is that the altar was originally built because of some kind of plague of pestilence. The Greeks prayed to all their gods and nothing happened. A philosopher who I want to say may have been Aristotle (can't remember exactly) said that there must be another god out there that we don't know about. They built the altar and worshipped this Unknown God and the famine, pestilence, or plague was gone. This is very similar to what Moses did when they raised the serpent the Israelites were healed. I only put this on here for something to possibly investigate or possibly do some further research on, but I do find it quite interesting the possible connections.184.177.47.199 (talk) 01:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Joshua Allan184.177.47.199 (talk) 01:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This whole article is actually just a rewrite of a page from the book of missionary Don_Richardson_(missionary) "Eternity in their Hearts" ( Chapter 1 on Athens ). I came upon this article doing research about that book. ( you can read that part of the book here : [1] )
It is not word for word, but the whole reasoning is the same, as well as the sources that are exactly the same.
The problem here is that the part about Epimenides is actually an invention from Don_Richardson_(missionary) : the story from Diogenes_Laërtius is not at all as stated in the book and in the article.
Also the two sources about "an unknown god" ( Philopatris and Pausanius ) are just single sentences, not sources talking about the article's subject, and actually both state "unknown gods" ( plural ).
Also, the whole idea of an unknown god in ancient greece is ( part of ) the thesis of Richardson's book, and he states that that unknown god is actually Yahveh.
I have not found any other trace of that idea, and would be very interrested in earing about one.
This whole article is a complete invention. If rewritten, it would need to be based only on the actual fact, which is that two greek authors talk about "unknown gods", not a single "unknown god" ( at least in the french translation, I need to check for the english one ). All the rest of this article is pure invention.
I unfortunately only have the references in French at the moment, but I will tomorrow search for the greek->english translation of the 3 greek sources.
The 3 texts cited in the article, that do not actually contain what the article say they do :
Here is for the text from Diogenes : [2] as you can see, it is not at all the same story as in the article.
Also, the more anecdotal part about "unknown gods" from Pliostratus : [3], it states "unknown Gods", not "unknown God".
And finally for Pausanias it's also a plural : [4]
So the first part of the article is not factual at all. The second part is solely about the Bible ...
Please at least put a banner on this page saying it's controversial ( I don't know how, I'm new ), because it is much more than controversial, it's false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthurwolf (talk • contribs) 23:24, 24 April 2011
When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured to the right.
Thank you very much ! I will wait for a while to see if anyone has additional sources for this. I have also contacted the author of the book ( Richardson ) to see if maybe he has more sources for his claim. I will come back here later and ask how to rewrite the article, in case nobody has additional sources. Arthurwolf (talk) 23:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The book Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede is fairly old, for such a concept to be accurate ( a single Unknown God in ancient greece ), one would expect to find some other more recent source for it ... I can't read german, but a quick look in the book and on the internet shows it seems to be only based on the Bible passage from Acts ... I would be very much interrested in an english translation of the book showing it has other sources for the concept, or in any other more recent work showing other sources for the concept ... --Arthurwolf (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's from 1913 actually. I used the van der Horst chapter to rewrite the beginning to make it clear the idea is by Norden. There's plenty more in that chapter and plenty of other sources out there. Even if this theory/idea all stems from that one 1913 book, we can still make an article out of discussing these concepts. I removed the hoax tag; if anything it's a fringe theory rather than a hoax. Fences&Windows21:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree fringe theory seems appropriate. However, the last part : « According to a story told by Diogenes Laërtius, ... However, at least one, if not several sheep led the Athenians to a location that had no god associated with it. Thus an altar was built there without a god's name inscribed upon it. ». Is not accurate. If you read the original text from DL : http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Lives_of_the_Eminent_Philosophers/Book_I#Epimenides , no mention is made to altars to an unknown god. Actually this makes the whole passage about Epimenides irrelevant ... Should I remove it ? --Arthurwolf (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It *is* a theory/hypothesis (and a fringe one at that), you clearly have not read the previous conversations on this page about this, please inform yourself about existing conversations before entirely and unilaterally reverting them. This idea comes from the 1913 book, and is not supported anywhere/anytime else. You should first participate/add to the existing discussion about this on this Talk page before single-handedly reverting previous work. Arthurwolf~enwiki (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Refocusing this page to line up better with it's titled topic
The English language version of this page seems quite focused on the biblical reference to the Unknown God and not general idea of the "Unknown God" in Greek culture. The Greek language version of this page does a much better job putting the this idea in broader historical and cultural terms.
I propose scaling back a lot of the current content on the English language page and moving it to a more appropriate page (perhaps the page for Paul the Apostle, the christianization of Greece, or a page discussing other religions mentioned in the bible?) then building out more general information about the Unknown God in a Greek cultural setting starting with the referenced material from the Greek language page. The scaled back current content could then be a section in the page. If these changes come to pass it might also make sense to change the primary title of this page to "Agnostos Theos". I assume the idea of the Unknown God is not unique to Greek culture, so if this page is going to focus on Greek culture it should probably use the Greek term for the idea.
The introductory paragraph was confusing and/or misleading, so I've made a few section divisions and split the intro into two sections. (With regard to the "theory", it was actually a book.) Then I went and added a new introductory paragraph since it needed one. I've made some changes and moved a few things around, like I moved the stuff about the Roman altar into a different section since it's something else. I also added a section on the unknowable One from Neoplatonism. 2601:49:8400:26B:887A:5BD8:E2E:A46C (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
