Jump to content

Talk:Accuracy International Arctic Warfare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Fellow Wikipedians, Why isn't there a section for the rifle's use in various video games? Is there a reason? Should I add it?

Z. G.

Agreed, I and many other men in the 18-40 demographic would probably have never heard of this weapon if not for games such as Counter Strike where the Arctic Warfare Police (AWP) features prominently as the most powerful sniper rifle in the game.

J. C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.28.6.18 (talk) 21:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I may be a bit late to this but yeah I do agree with this LOL. If this isn't replied to in a week I'll probably add it. Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 03:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish army

[edit]

The L96 was used by the Swedish army, if its alright with everyone i'm going to add sweden as one of it's users. Infact it was because of sweden that the L96 was upgraded to `AW` to come with the Swedish winter.

R Johnson

I think that's a good idea.
[edit]

The link on the Bundeswehr's sniper rifle G22 links on the G22 organsisation of countries. See linked pages from the G22 page!

Weapons put in games

[edit]

This is the best sniper in the NEXON game Combat Arms its a 1 hitter unless they have some sort of extra protection even shot in the foot will kill with it and no this weapon costs at least 4 grand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.84.9.226 (talk) 20:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is also the signature Sniper Rifle from Counter Strike, and I'm surprised this has not been brought up 75.131.224.220 (talk) 05:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Necropost, but I'll just say that it's not the signature weapon of CS, just that it's a really popular weapon in the series. 69.158.144.42 (talk) 18:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Necropost again, but it's also in Team Fortress 2 as the AWPer Hand. User:SmartyPantsKid 20:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Accuracy International Arctic Warfare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Split proposal

[edit]

Thoughts about splitting off AT and AX as their own articles? They don't have to be anything fancy and with the split process we can preserve most of the relevant stuff that's already written. Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 23:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare&oldid=1217152627"