Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglo-Welsh
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT. dbenbenn | talk 15:27, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
The votes were 2 delete, 2 redirect, 1 keep. Since the deletes weren't in the majority, I've reinterpreted each "delete" as "delete or redirect".
There's nothing here that isn't already said (in better fashion, too) at Wales, History of Wales, Welsh Marches, and Politics of the United Kingdom. And there's nothing here that cannot be merged into those articles. The main purpose of this article seems to be to attempt to establish the notability of The Sheep Shagger (q.v.) Uncle G 17:28, 2005 Jan 19 (UTC)
- REdirect to England and Wales? Dunc|☺ 21:56, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect or simply delete. Josh Cherry 02:41, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to something meaningful like Anglo-Welsh literature. It's only an adjective, and the definition here isn't even correct. (And by the way, I'm Welsh) Deb 18:02, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep but change to something like "English-Welsh rivalry". It should not be merged into "England and Wales". The point of the latter is that "England and Wales" is an entity which is distinct from the rest of the UK in certain ways, most importantly in having a common legal system (Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own). Philip 04:13, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Del. Nothing worth merging; if worthwhile material on rivalry rises to significance that requires split from E&W, split it when it is no longer hypothetical. --Jerzy(t) 02:35, 2005 Jan 24 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.